Adventures in internet dating blog
Physical attraction was a dominant theme driving positive evaluations; this is not shallow, attraction is biological (we’ll talk about this another time).Communication was also a key theme: individuals liked a person’s smile, his/her eye contact, and good communication (friendly, nice).As one example, Ambady and Rosenthal found that students who viewed 6-to-15 second video segments of professors were able to form judgments that were consistent with judgments of teachers’ actual students.So, you’re now probably thinking how you can work to make an accurate first impression on a speed date? These factors introduce high levels of uncertainty, and according to Berger and Calbrese, humans do not like uncertainty.This modern phenomenon is largely credited to Rabbi Deyo, who explains speed dating started as a way for Jewish singles to meet one another.Midway through the evening, we interrupted dates asking participants to make a brief introduction and then to stop their date.
This introduces the question of how you make that great first impression?In other words, physical attraction along with positive communication behaviors explained variance in the belief of whether or not someone thought they would have a relationship with you.Pretty telling stuff here, particularly since a speed date lasts less than 10 minutes.These results are especially important given the long line of research indicating that thin slice judgments are consistent with long-term impressions. Houser, our quantitative findings further supported our open-ended responses.Nonverbal immediacy (e.g., smiling, eye contact, open body orientation) along with social and physical attraction helped explain individuals’ beliefs about relational development.